Showing posts with label Citizen Kane. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Citizen Kane. Show all posts

Thursday, 6 December 2012

Citizen Kane (Orson Welles, 1941)


"I guess Rosebud is just a... piece in a jigsaw puzzle... a missing piece"

Introduction

After analysing every film in the Sight & Sound Top 10, we finish on Citizen Kane. Of course we do. Only now has the film been “dethroned” from the top spot, after residing there for 50 years. Truly, it earned its place. Should it remain untouchable? Surely it shouldn’t remain at the top of the poll forever, should it? I would be happy if it did. If, as all the films swapped and interchanged – many vanishing from the Top 10 completely – I would firmly, indefinitely and concretely ensure Citizen Kane remains. Ground-breaking, profound and personal and created by a genius; I support its immovability. What a shame then, that it moved down a spot in 2012.

Orson Welles

The starting point is always Orson Welles. Akin to Leonardo Da Vinci’s ‘Mona Lisa’, Citizen Kane has become mythic in its status in history partly due to the creator, and the many talents he had. We are fascinated by writer-directors – and we often laugh at the audacity of their self-casting within films like Reservoir Dogs and Signs. Orson Welles chose not-only to write, direct and produce the film; he also took the titular role; portraying a man from his young-twenties through to old-age. This brave decision is the type of choice that oozes genius – supreme confidence and, crucially, the correct casting.

Welles has a cherub-like charm that carries the film on his shoulders alone – and features that remain when he is made-up to look like an old man. The film covers the rise and fall; life and death of Charles Foster Kane; a shrewd businessman; a political force; a paranoid recluse. Partly influenced by the life and times of the media-magnate William Randolph Hearst, it was a film of its time that, through Hearst’s influence, newspaper coverage was slim – and it failed at the box-office. But, a good film doesn’t hide away and positive reviews kept the film known. Bit-by-bit, Citizen Kane became the masterpiece as it is known today. It’s also worth noting that Welles was only 24 years old he made the film – and to think that he achieved all this at such a youthful age adds to his genius status.

Writing, Direction … and Innovation

But Welles was not alone in creating the film. He co-wrote the script, and the story is broken-up, told from the perspective of a reporter investigating the final word Kane stated on his deathbed: “Rosebud”. We are told about Kane through his friends, family and lover – and the different perspectives reveal a different side to him. He was a public figure – a showman. But, socially and personally, he had identity issues – isolating himself from the world in an incomplete fortress - Xanadu. He pines after his childhood, symbolised by his precious sled; the aforementioned “Rosebud”.

Pauline Kael argued that this story is what certifies Citizen Kane as a masterpiece – and, rather than crediting Orson Welles with this, she supported a popular opinion that co-writer Herman J. Mankiewicz is the real master behind the film.

But, the story alone is not what separates this film from the rest of the pack. Technically, the film is almost a how-to use-a-camera tool-kit. Dissecting each scene, you can find numerous techniques that were ahead of their time – everything from the ground-breaking use of deep-focus (though Mizoguchi used it before 1941) through to the continuous shot from behind a gate and, despite the instruction to not trespass, we do, by hovering over and into Xanadu. One shot, revealing a lover of Welles manages to pass through a glass roof and another shot is situated in the ground, looking at such an angle that Welles had to adjust the flooring to get so low. Gregg Toland is attributed to the majority of these techniques – but again, it was Welles that managed to include the young Toland in his production crew.

Bernard Herrman’s score is simply fascinating – changing completely as the scene adapts to suit the different perspective discussed. The casting includes the scene-stealing Joseph Cotton, who would go on to appear in Shadow of a Doubt and The Third Man. The make-up to give the impression that 24-year old Welles would look like an aging man – inspired by Make Way for Tomorrow – is flawless, still standing the test of time today. The list goes on and on.

So much more…

Barry Norman writes how the film “speaks afresh to each succeeding generation” and this truly is Orson Welles crowning achievement. It is no surprise that people compared this to The Social Network (not that it compares that much) – but I’m sure you could find countless biopics and life-stories that owe a debt to Citizen Kane. Indeed, most films owe a debt to Citizen Kane. This is a film that has influenced almost every successful or critically-acclaimed director – Spielberg, Scorsese, Paul Thomas Anderson … and everyone else. This short analysis is not enough – and indeed, there are many books available to support every different aspect which has established this film amongst the very best. I cannot think of a film amongst the Top 10 that is accessible and yet technically ground-breaking, and also created in such a unique set of circumstances that it could never be remade. It is the film you would use as an argument to prove that films from the 1940’s are incredible. It is a film you would use to convince someone that these lists matter. And it is a film that, despite its shift from the top spot in the poll, will never be truly removed. As it remains the Greatest Film of All-Time in virtually every other poll in the world. And I whole-heartedly agree.

Epilogue: This brings to a close an analysis of every film in the 2012 Top 10 Greatest Films of All-Time. I hope you attempt the same challenge and, when you do, read the previous analysis linked below:


2. Citizen Kane (Welles, 1941)

Large Association of Movie Blogs

Wednesday, 29 August 2012

My Top 10 Films of All-Time

The dust has settled. The whole "Sight & Sound list" arguments have finished. One of the sites I contribute to, Flickering Myth, asked all their writers to submit ten films which we believed were the ten "best films of all time". I sent my ten and kept hold of them for this post...

One thing Sight and Sound included in the magazine was a very brief description as to why the critics/directors chose the films. Some, obviously, gave no context or reasoning. Merely ten films that they personally defined as the 'best' ten films of all time.

Here are my ten. They are in no particular order and therefore have no ranking. Ten is tough enough - choosing a specific top film is simply ludicrous. I didn't obsess over this either, instead, I pretty-much considered what first came to mind and swapped a couple when I had more than ten.

1) In The Mood For Love - I had to have a foreign-film. From the one's I know, I could've chosen Amelie or an Almodovar ... or Bergman, but this film was top of many "Films of the 00's" lists and I can understand that, whilst the others I struggle more with. Moody, personal and incredibly well-shot. The actors are shy and quiet, but the brief looks and moments are what hits you so hard. You know those passing glances.

2) Modern Times - Chaplin, equally, had to make an appearance. I love how he makes social-structures into a joke. I still wait for the 'machine' that helps me eat whilst working ...

3) Midnight Cowboy - I love the late 60's for many reasons. American film-making simply exploded into a new era. Midnight Cowboy is less mentioned but I believe it to be stronger than many.

4) Jurassic Park - Though a personal favourite, the special effects rarely reach this height. What other film has special effects that, without crazy 'remastering' still stands so strong. Even Lord of the Rings looks false - not this.

5) Signs - I love Shyamalan and I think history will support this. We shall see, but Signs was on my mind when I wrote this. A deeply personal film - set in the context of a different-type of Independence Day.

6) Pulp Fiction - New filmmakers since 1994 owe a debt to Tarantino. Still remains as slick as it ever was - and remains the best film of its type. Edgar Wright, Joe Cornish, Doug Liman, Guy Ritchie all owe something to Tarantino.

7) Citizen Kane - Technically genius. Perfect acting - and acting of such a difficult manner (from 20 to 70!). Socially relevant in 1941. Socially relevant today. Innovative narration.

8) Vertigo - I worry that this is too obvious, but I stand by it. I don't think Hitchcock has been as ambiguous as he is here. Though about obsession - we become obsessed through Jimmy Stewart. Herrman's haunting score. It reaches such profound heights - and deserves its No 1 spot.


9) Annie Hall - So brutally honest and true. No one is as effacing. Most filmmakers claim to make films 'for themselves', Allen is clearly doing this, but his voice is so unique and pessimistic. This film is a brilliant example of comedy at its best. John Hughes, Ricky Gervais, the-guy-who-made-The-Wonder-Years... anything whereby the fourth-wall is trashed for the sake of a good monologue.

10) The Godfather - I originally preferred The Godfather Part II (Remember, this year is the first year they have been split up in the poll) but, the more I think about it, I realise that every single thing about The Godfather is perfect, whilst what is good about Part II is how when we are dealing with all the Cuban politics, you are excited about DeNiro's Don in little Italy whilst when all of that backstory dries up, "I know it was you..." happens and you#re back into the Pacino narrative. Godfather is perfect, start to finish.

Large Association of Movie Blogs

Sunday, 27 February 2011

A-Z #44: Citizen Kane

You can pick up hundreds of DVD's for a round-pound each - it doesn't matter. Its never about quantity, its about quality. A-Z is my way of going through my collection, from A-Z, and understanding why I own the films ... or you can tell me why I should sell 'em

#44 - Citizen Kane 

Why did I buy it?

C'mon - this is The greatest film of all-time. This is according to Sight & Sound, Cahiers du cinéma 100 films, Kinovedcheskie Russia Top 10, Romanian Critics Top 10, Time Out Magazine Greatest Films and Roger Ebert claims it as "the greatest movie ever made". It was also the double-disc edition which I found for £4 in Oxfam - this included an incredible documentary hosted by Barry Norman as to why it is deemed so good.

Why do I still own it?
 
I have watched it multiple times and it truly is a masterpiece. In terms of what is fascinating about watching it now - Orson Welles performance as Kane during multiple different points in his life, the story that is hinged on what the term 'rosebud' means - this 'revelation' is as important (if not moreso) that Luke finding out who his Dad is in The Empire Strikes Back.
 
On top of this, this film combined multiple cinematic elements which, nowadays, is taken for granted. Deep-focus, special effects, impossible zoom-in's and obscure camera-angles all feature in this film. If this was the only film in your collection, you would be content (Obviously, you would really need to visit the shop soon and  buy more DVD's).

Maybe everyone is wrong - and it is crap... therefore it should be sold. What do you think? Do you rate Citizen Kane so high?

Remember - you can always email The Simon and Jo Film Show directly using this email: simonandjoshow@gmail.com
We are also on Twitter  and Facebook.

Large Association of Movie Blogs

Wednesday, 23 February 2011

The Critical Introduction to Film... (Part 2)

I am currently reading Film: A Critical Introduction by Tom Wallis and Maria Pramaggiore. As I read each chapter, I shall write the few thoughts I have...

Chapter 2: The Orchestration of Detail

Continuing from the last blog post regarding interpretation and expectations, the next focus is detail. Motifs and parrallels are details placed to enhance understanding and ensure themes are brought to the forefront of the story. Wallis and Pramaggiore state "Motifs can also encourage spectators to compare and contrast characters, plot events, objects of situations". The book refers to Citizen Kane and the motif of 'rosebud'. Further to this, you could add to the list of important motifs other examples such as the graffitied cement-section in Mystic River, the triangular formation that is built obsessively in Close Encounters of the Third Kind or the black monolith in 2001: A Space Odyssey. These motifs focus our attention on what is important - and what we should think about. For example, what is important about the cement-section in Mystic River? The connection to childhood, the rebellious aspects of their youth dictating their adulthood - the moment whereby their lives changed forever through Dave's abduction.

Motif's signify multiple reminders of a theme, whereas parrallels may simply be the same sequence repeated or a shot which clearly asks for a comparison between two characters. So, we can consider the repeated tracking shot in Shaun of the Dead as Simon Pegg walks from his house to the newsagent - in the first instance people act like zombies, though the second time people actually are zombies. Another parrallel may be how the shot that finishes Smokin' Aces forces you to see the two comatose-criminals sat on either side of Reynolds character and we compare the two - are they important? No? Then pull the plug Reynolds. (Note how it then zooms in on Reynolds as the two criminals are not important - it is Reynolds who is important). Wallis and Pramaggiore finish this section by noting how "paying attention to repetition, motifs and parrallels can help viewers to recognise a film's deeper structure".

The details often take place at important points - such as contrasting the start and end of a film (the feather in Forrest Gump). Sometimes they structure specific turning points in the film (Every time Cobb exits a dream, again, he checks his Totem in Inception). But even camerawork can dictate the end of sequences - potentially fading out to signal the end of a sequence (I find this happens alot when huge-chunks of time separates each section, following the fade out with text "Massachussets, 1895" before continuing with the story)
Having just mentioned 'huge-chunks of time', sometimes the non-chronological structure of a story is set-up to focus your attention on different aspects. The repetition of a feature often beginning these sequences to clarify the time-period and where the sequence takes place.

Its fair to say that, at the moment, anything presented on the screen is not a happy-accident. Filmmakers choose to set-up different parrallels and motifs to make meaning and ensure that the film is structurally poetic. Having said that, there is many articles on how Tron:Legacy has much more depth to it than what may first be the case - comparing the Sam Flynn/Kevin Flynn storyline to Hamlet. Personally, it is worth being wary that meaning can be found in film, despite not beng originally intended. I don't think this is too much of a problem, as an audience, we can interpret Art in whatever way we believe is appropriate and once a film is made and exhibited, it is out of the personal domain and in the publics hands. Though meaning may not have been intended, there may be subconsious themes that speak through the film that the filmmaker was unaware of. 


Remember - you can always email The Simon and Jo Film Show directly using this email: simonandjoshow@gmail.com
We are also on Twitter  and Facebook.

Large Association of Movie Blogs

Saturday, 13 February 2010

The Simon and Jo Show Podcast: 14/02/2010

We are set up at the Curzon Mayfair, but begin just off King Street a little close to where St James Theatre used to be ... we reveal why we are there on the podcast.

We review The Princess and the Frog, Youth in Revolt, Nine and the masterpiece: Citizen Kane. Then, to finish, we tell all about impressive and completely unimpressive romance in movies.

Trailer coverage is on Toy Story, Girl with the Dragon Tattoo, I Love You Phillip Morris and, the hotly anticipated theatrical trailer of Shyamalan's The Last Airbender.

Music is from Nine and Herrmans magnificent music for Citizen Kane.

Sunday, 6 December 2009

The Simon and Jo Show Podcast: 06/12/09

This week, with the focus firmly on Richard Kelly's third effort The Box on release we discuss Richard Kelly career to date and then onto directorial debuts - every director has one and once they have done it, it represents the coming of a new artist ... but which one, if you were to choose, is the best ...

All will be revealed in Podcast 11 of 'The Simon and Jo Show' - links on the left!