"Eternal life will only be given to those who die"
Introduction
Neil Jordan has a had a long career in filmmaking, with a cover-article in this months Sight & Sound. Prior to filmmaking, Jordan was a novellist too writing fiction including Night in Tunisia (1976) and, most recently, Mistaken (2011). Therefore considering Byzantium is based on a play - Moira Buffini's A Vampire Story - it is no suprise that Jordan has chosen this project, proving that his latest vampire film is not another film aspiring for Twilight success, but instead a neat re-tread of similar themes of his 1994 film Interview with a Vampire. Saorsie Ronan and Gemma Arterton play the timeless vampires, set in the coastal town, and at a point whereby the everlasting life Saorsie Ronan has been given is taking its toll - will she turn into the angry, dangerous woman her Mother has become? Or will she stop herself from sinkming her teeth into the next victim and consider a different way of life?
The Real Vampire
Setting the scene, we see Eleanor (Saorsie Ronan in a calm, measured performance) tearing pages from a book, narrating the story and introducing herself from a council estate. We then see an elderly man speak to her - a man who has collected and read the torn pages - and cautiously, he invites her into his house. As an allegory of the film as a whole, we question whether Eleanor will be the victim before it is revealed that it is the elderly man, aware of his final moments of life, who is offering his blood to satisfy her thirst. Eleanor is a vampire, who is due to remain a teenager for the rest of her life - the eternal school-girl. Our assumption of her innocence swiftly changes in these opening moments - akin to the innocent Eli in Let The Right One In, a young woman whose kindness and sensitivity is marred by a dangerous thirst for blood. The two films carry much in common, but Byzantium seems to build upon a sense of history and tradition that is left ambiguously open-ended in Let The Right One In. This manages to give a sense of scale and scope that we rarely see, as Byzantium manages to jump through time and weave together a story that is set across 200 years.
Eleanor and her Mother, Clara (Gemma Arteton) are two female vampires - a rare anomoly due to the traditions of an established order that was, and remains, dominated by men. Clara uses her body to raise money for herself and Eleanor - and she kills when hungry opposed to Eleanor who feeds on the weak and the elderly who are ready to die. Hastings was a location as Jordan was keen to create an environment that had a haunted feel - a seaside town that reflects an ever-changing world through the waves eroding the past. He lingers on historical buildings that have lasted through hundreds of years; the wind blows and the sky is grey. A true sense of Britishness and naturalism that we can relate to when visiting a seaside town on a dull-day. This is not a glossy film as the fairground rides are dirty and often remain static while the buildings are decaying. The old traditions and attitudes of sexism are dying too...
A Mature Twilight
The adult themes of sexuality, prostitution and abuse push this film to a new, maturer level that many will appreciate - including fans of Twilight, who may have watched the first film at the age of 12 and are now 17 - especially as Stephanie Meyer's series was known for a sexist and simplistic attitude towards relationships. But, as a pro-feminist film that depicts the stripper/prostitute central character with revealing attire, it seems to contradict itself - especially when the hyper-sexual content will surely attract a male audience with only one thought on their mind.
Gemma Arteton, as the strong and powerful Clara, carries the role with confidence. A victim, but a dangerous threat, could be turned into a clear-cut villain, but this unease is well-place and continues until the end. Johnny Lee Miller seems to be channelling his scarred Ruthven on his role of 'the monster' in Danny Boyle's production of Frankenstein - albeit without the innocence, while Sam Riley's Darvell is the Vampire chasing after Clara and Eleanor - his cherubian looks seem to offset his unclear motives. The stand-out role was Caleb Landry-Jones as Frank, Eleanor's love interest. His greasy hair and confused expressions seem to clearly communicate the lack of confidence of the teenager - a contrast heightened by Eleanor who, born in 1804, is 200 years old and knows herself better than most humans do.
A Dark Truth
It is the darkness and grim truth that simmers beneath the surface of this Vampire Drama. Themes of protection of the weak - and hunting the powerful. The power and abuse of men through to the empowerment of women by illegal methods. As with many vampire stories and supernatural narratives set within a naturalistic context, we are very-much aware of the lonliness and depression that envelopes our lead characters. Eternal life is a difficult cross to bear - but lonliness is something we all experience. Through the loss of a loved one or a recent break-up - these are elements we cannot control and yet we survive nevertheless. Neil Jordan portrays a haunted and lonely world, whereby the monotany of life is eternal for Clara and Eleanor, and as viewers we can appreciate the many themes weaved throughout the story as Byzantium remains much more than a scary movie.
Originally written/published for Flickering Myth on 30th May 2013
Showing posts with label Gemma Arteton. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Gemma Arteton. Show all posts
Thursday, 30 May 2013
Sunday, 12 June 2011
Quantum of Solace (Marc Forster, 2008)
"This man and I have some unfinished business."
Introduction
This is a little unconventional, I appreciate that, but I think it will be a case of fillng in the blanks over the years. I have recently watched all the James Bond films and, with Quantum of Solace, I have now finished. I have written a post on Dr No - which you should really check out.
After Casino Royale, I was so excited about the film until the bad reviews arrived and then I heard the scathing attack from Mark Kermode. Before I sat down, the initial reaction was exceptionally negative and I do recall reviews even giving the film 1*. To say this upset me is putting it mildly because, for better or worse, the film does have problems and there is no point in pretending this isn't true.
After Casino Royale, I was so excited about the film until the bad reviews arrived and then I heard the scathing attack from Mark Kermode. Before I sat down, the initial reaction was exceptionally negative and I do recall reviews even giving the film 1*. To say this upset me is putting it mildly because, for better or worse, the film does have problems and there is no point in pretending this isn't true.
The Continuation of Casino Royale
I always found it difficult to stomach the 'love' James Bond had for Vesper Lynd in Casino Royale - at least the film had amazing action sequences and incredibly tense poker matches. In Quantum of Solace this weak aspect to the story (M constantly reminding Bond about the tragedy - "It'd be a pretty cold bastard who didn't want revenge for the death of someone he loved") whereby Vesper's betrayal and 'importance' ultimately rings untrue. If it wasn't Bond's motivation, then it would be a better film - and, for better or worse, did it even have to be a motivation at all? For Gods sake - it's his job! Another problem with Quantum of Solace is the repetition of Bond 'going rogue' (another facet which provides much comedy on The Hollywood Saloon podcast) - he does this in Casino Royale, Licence to Kill and Die Another Day - 4 out of 7 films, Bond rebels against M and MI-6 and, suprisingly, is accepted back. I swear, if Bond goes rogue again, M should have him killed.
I remember when Casino Royale was released, James Bond fans were concerned that with a reboot of the franchise, it would lead to remakes of the original James Bond films. Luckily, this does not happen - though in a similar way to From Russia with Love, whereby SPECTRE is introduced, Quantum of Solace provides a new 'group' that is undetected on MI6's radar: QUANTUM.
I remember when Casino Royale was released, James Bond fans were concerned that with a reboot of the franchise, it would lead to remakes of the original James Bond films. Luckily, this does not happen - though in a similar way to From Russia with Love, whereby SPECTRE is introduced, Quantum of Solace provides a new 'group' that is undetected on MI6's radar: QUANTUM.
Bond Girl

One thing I laughed alot at was a use of the script mentioned on 'The Hollywood Saloon' podcast, whereby Olga's 'Camille' seems to appear multiple times, in a car, and state "Get in.". I recall listening to the podcast and hearing her say this time and time again - but upon watching the film, it is clear that this is a little 'feature' of Camille - she turns up int he car the first time "Get in.", Bond says some witty remark and she simply repeats her instruction "Get in". This happens twice - the second time to remind us of that special first meeting. So, though incredibly funny when hearing it used on The Hollywood Saloon, it is not as alien and out of place Andy and Jon imply. But Camille remains strong - with a motive that is never undermined by 007.
Flawed
With these flaws, we beg the question why. Is it the script? No. I don't think Purvis, Wade and Haggis did a bad job - I'm sure it could be improved, but the story itself works. Though it wasn't neccessary, I see the purpose in continuing the story from Casino Royale. This leads to the actors who, again, were brilliant. As I mentioned Kurylenko was great whilst Mathieu Amalric as Dominic Greene was suitably sinister, with a realistic edge. Daniel Craig, Judi Dench, Giancarlo Giannini and Jeffrey Wright, reprising their roles from Casino Royale, were suitably strong and, especially Leiter, I love his cynical edge. Wright gives the impression that he knows he is on the strong 'super-power' side - and that he will probably 'win' if he wanted to - but he is held back by superiors who can't do their job. This cynicism complements Judi Dench's M, who we trust and believe in as 007's superior.

I think the buck stops with Forster. His choice to have multiple sequences edited together in a way that confuses and cuts too fast is constantly a source of frustration. The opening sequence as cars chase Bond, rather than dwell on the vast space and skill of the stunt drivers, seems to cut every 2-seconds to another image from a different angle. Further to this, we have Mr White's escape juxtaposed with a horse-race for no clear reason. One sequence, that starts off effectively, suddenly drops in quality when Forster tries to make it more grandoise. Bond realises who QUANTUM are, as they all try and leave the opera they are in attendance for and, following a nervous face-off against Greene, Bond is chased out and we see an incredible gun fight. I say 'see an gun fight' because you don't hear a thing. Now we have the Opera music over the action sequence, rather than the rat-a-tat-tat of guns firing whilst we cut back and forth between the action and the opera. Thanks Forster - you mistake me for someone who cares about Opera and Horse-Racing - I watch 007 for the action and the stunts.
Finale and Fitting in the Canon
I used to despise this film, but after a second watch, I simply think it is an exceptionally weak James Bond film. Forster tried something that completely didn't work and, now it is done, Broccoli and Wilson can learn from their mistakes and hire someone who can direct action ... like Sam Mendes (wait-a-sec ... Sam Mendes? As in the director of American Beauty and Revolutionary Road ... not exactly action...). The end of Casino Royale gave the impression that Bond was back - and we could watch the next film without the 'love' and just enjoy the action. What we got was constant references to his 'love' in the previous film and action sequences that are not memorable. The biggest concern is that nothing is memorable at all - Casino Royale had the free-running, the poker-match, the macchete-fight in the stairwell to remind us of great action. This balanced out the love side to things. Quantum of Solace has all that love-stuff - "I was sorry to hear about Vesper. I think she loved you." - but action sequences I canot vividly recall because how badly they were edited - nothing flowed. Can I remember a single stunt? Not really because it was so unclear. I remember the bit when Bond fell down and swung round - with foot attached to rope - killing 'Mitchell', but I just wish it was much clearer.
At the very least, by mentioning 'Quantum' at the end of the film shows that, in fact, there is much more to reveal. For example, we saw many, many members of QUANTUM at the Opera and, I would like to think, this is an opportunity for many missions in the future... lets just hope that with all the many extra months of prepatory time for Bond 23, they can right-the-wrongs of Quantum of Solace...

Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)