Showing posts with label Sam Rockwell. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Sam Rockwell. Show all posts

Saturday, 31 August 2013

The Way Way Back (Nat Faxon/Jim Rash, 2013 )


The opening moments of The Way Way Back highlight an age-old rating system that every teenager has entertained in their mind – or they have at least discussed it in a playground: What would you rate yourself? Duncan (Liam James) struggles to answer, venturing a ‘6’ while his Mum’s boyfriend Trent (Steve Carrell) ignores his answer and claims that Duncan is a ‘3’. This disconnect and conflict in values between Trent and Duncan provides the backbone to the film as Duncan desperately escapes the clutches of the family and finds solace in the Water Wizz – a water park owned (or at least managed) by Owen (Sam Rockwell). Owen and Duncan strike up an unlikely friendship and Owen becomes a temporary father-figure to coach Duncan in life – ensuring that Duncan acts “like a man” by ogling the bottoms of girls and understands sarcasm.

Likeable, twee and inevitably a “favourite film” for those who relate to the nervous, awkward teenager, The Way Way Back plays it safe and seems to show a formula that clearly “works” for the indie film including a large cast that recalls Little Miss Sunshine (Toni Collette and Steve Carrell appear in both) and the use of the summer as a time for change for shy, reserved boys – recalling Adventureland and Youth in Revolt.

The personal, yet “we’ve-heard-it-all-before” sentiment, that resolves the many situations may be illuminating and important to Duncan but they fail to address the complexities of others. Trent’s image-obsessed daughter Steph (Zoe Levin) is merely a character to be mocked as she appears to be an extension of Trent himself – in one moment, Steph shouts at Duncan about where he has been and how he has “ruined everything”; it would be nice to see Steph’s own worries and how she too – like Duncan – is often left to her own devices to find entertainment. This could be asked of many characters, but even Trent is clearly “bad” while Duncan’s Mum, Pam, is “good” – is it possible that Trent may be trying to change through Pam’s influence? Could Pam be a problem herself? In the Water Wizz world, there is no grey area – it’s all black and white. Or blue and yellow. But maybe that’s too complicated, eh, buddy?

The mantra of The Way Way Back is “Don’t Settle”. Sam Rockwell’s lovable, but useless manager, ‘Owen’ offers this advice to coming-of-age Duncan (Liam James) as our teenager vents his frustrations about his Mum’s boyfriend and his worries about the future. Ironically, The Way Way Back seems to have “settled” for direct storytelling and well-known themes. It becomes flat and specific in the ideas it wants to address – without trying to keep a little ambiguity about the challenges adults face. But the comedy is well-written while Jim Rash (a co-writer) and Maya Rudolph as the Water Wizz “family”, alongside a perfectly-pitched performance from Sam Rockwell, do make you consider why we work so hard at all – maybe we should just pack in our jobs and all work at theme parks? The Way Way Back manages to tell a tale of teenage troubles, and how they can be overcome, but when teenagers reflect on their own life, I doubt they will see a truth and instead see the complexities – something The Way Way Back misses out.

Wednesday, 21 August 2013

Seven Psychopaths (Dir. Martin McDonagh/2012)

From In Bruges to “In Hollywood”. Seasoned playwright and filmmaker Martin McDonagh directed his first feature in 2008 to audiences who lapped-up his semi-serious, black-comedy. In Bruges was set within a quaint and picturesque town, so his move to the bright lights and big city of Los Angeles is a different setting to say the least! Seven Psychopaths deconstructs Colin Farrell's script-writing obsessive 'Marty' amidst the wannabe film-stars and Californian cliffs with a dark tone that In Bruges fans will be happy to see again.
Opening on the Hollywood sign, drunk screenwriter Marty (Colin Farrell) searches for an idea for a script. Marty's drinking-buddy Billy (Sam Rockwell) thieves dogs from the rich with the help of kind elderly gentleman Hans (Christopher Walken). Through Billy's criminal enterprise, Marty is dragged into this world as bullets blow-off limbs with “reality” and fantasy colliding as we meet dog-obsessed gangster Charlie (Woody Harrelson replaying his smart-alecky but “oh-so-charming” villain we've seen before in Zombieland). Between the script Marty writes and the drama unfolding on-screen, McDonagh's twisty-plot and quirky-characters simply don't hold our attention. The final act of Seven Psychopaths in the harsh-lit desert, drags the film to a convoluted close that we desperately hope would've been more satisfying. Michael Stuhlbarg and Michael Pitt even appear in a Pulp Fiction homage 'prologue', before they are promptly shot in the head. Considering neither appears on the poster and casting them purposefully echoed their roles in Boardwalk Empire, the sun had set on these characters as soon as they appeared on screen - and the film is littered with this type or predictability throughout.
Seven Psychopaths flips between a mystery (as we seek to know who each of the Seven Psychopaths are) and the established Hitchcock favourite “innocent man embroiled in criminal activity” plot. Like the mental-states of the psychopaths featured, the story seems to be unbalanced and uncontrolled as we dart between sequences and moments of fantasy and reality without clear rhyme or reason. Rather than playfully toying with the audience, Seven Psychopaths jarringly attempts to shock; arrogantly believing it has pulled the wool over your eyes – when anyone paying a slight bit of attention will see the ‘reveal’ of the final three psychopaths coming a mile off. 
Marty’s conflicted attitude about ending the film refects the directors own difficulties as McDonagh struggles to resolve all seven psychopathic threads. Though highlighting violence in cinema - and its effect on audiences, Seven Psychopaths delivers too late with no clear statement on the issue. 
It is disappointing that such a sharply-shot, gun-toting comedy fails to meet the well-structured film-junkie movie it desperately wants to be and the ambitious ending finishes the film on a whimper rather than the bang it hoped for.
3/5

Monday, 14 December 2009

Moon (Duncan Jones, 2009)

"I'm here to keep you safe, Sam. I want to help you"

Introduction

I watched this primarily because everyone seemed to have watched it and all came back with glowing reviews. Not one person seemed to have a problem with it. I knew nothing about it - and went it with mediocre expectations because though i have seen a fair few Sci-Fi movies I would hardly say I am a Sci-Fi fan. I don't rate Star Wars too highly and, having watched 2001: A Space Odyssey only once, I haven't felt the impact of that. I remember briefly showing up to a Sci-Fi/Fantasy club at school and found out pretty soon that it was more Star Wars, Star Trek, Elves and stuff club. The dinosaurs in Jurassic Park and a passing interest in Independence Day didn't really qualify. So, having gone into it knowing nothing I came out of the film initially perplexed.

Opinion

Its a sci-fi akin to Blade Runner with regard to the themes - clones and replicants - with an aesthetic that links more to Alien rather with its white, chunky white base. Very seventies. We have Sam Bell (Sam Rockwell) who works alone on 3 year contract on Moon, he crashes a vehicle and when saved by a clone of himself he realises he himself is a clone. That may have given alot of it away, but alas, this is set up in the first, say, 30 minutes. Sam Rockwell needed to act his ass off, and does so successfully. He holds this film up and gives us a chance to explore the deeper subtext. We also have on board this work base Gerty - a HAL-like machine voiced by Kevin Spacey who is intentionally mysterious and ambiguous - he is helping Sam, but is also created to 'do a job'. This is where my confusion lay - I didn't trust Gerty. I didn't know if we were to assume he is telling the truth or not. So, when Gerty is the one to inform the clones of who they are, I wasn't sure if it was true. Maybe we were supposed to believe that he was lying and therefore the plot progresses. Maybe Sam is the first of all the clones and so we don't know if he is a clone or not. Does this matter? Yes. Because there is a clear theme about the value of a clone and the value of a human, I mentally thought that there is more value in a non-clone human. When I read up on the plot post-watch, i felt that the simpleness of a plot, that I was so confused about, was so simple it lost the film some credability. Two clones on a base, the film shows what happens next. Thats so simplistic it seems upsetting... then again, that doesn't stop the questions raised by the film without tackling the themes in the narrative. Whether or not clones have value, etc. Point is, the credability was lost as I didn't care so much for clones so I didn't care so much for the lead. So it is difficult to get attached to a film whereby you are not invested in the lead character at all. Especially when he looks all victorian when he has no helmet on.

The ambiguity continues into the credits as we hear earths reaction to the clones return. It is left to us to consider the wider implications of clones, drones and the constant of monotonous work. So, this is the subtext - using and abusing employees in any context is the extension of a capitalist society. What is the value of Sam Bell and his work? More importantly, what is the real value of all the work we put in? And do our bosses and managers feel the same? Is our lives the same day-to-day running, akin to Sam Bell's life, with the hope that we will come back to our loved ones ... though knowing deep down, that the monotony and dullness of our career is slowly but surely ebbing away our relationship?

Its worth mentioning the stunning soundtrack by Clint Mansell - a composer who has composed for Aronovsky's The Fountains amongst others. The small piano riff alongside some deep bass and strange sounds gives a reall sense of loss and lonliness, while also giving the music a personal touch that reachs to the audience. A stunning soundtrack for a film that... may get better the more I watch it.