Showing posts with label David Lean. Show all posts
Showing posts with label David Lean. Show all posts

Friday, 16 September 2011

Great Expectations (David Lean, 1946)

"I have come back to let in the sunlight!"

Introduction

The trailer for Great Expectations displays the text "What forbidding mystery lay behind the shutters of Satis House?". By 1946, Citizen Kane and Xanadu had already screened across the world whilst, prior to that, the Oscar-winning Rebecca portrayed the mystical Manderlay too. It seems that cinema had a huge interest in large, decaying buildings - a relic of the past and an old tradition that, within its walls, secures madness in the mind of its tenants. Great Expectations is much less obsessed with the 'mystery' of Satis House - despite what the trailer says - and is much more obsessed with the world outside of the house and the fascinating characters that inhabit that world - we all know Pip, Estella, Magwich, Mrs Havisham and Mr Jaggers - and, more importantly, we find out about the different strands of society these characters come from.

A Historic Text

The story was originally written in 1860 by Charles Dickens and, since then, it has been portrayed many, many times - with a 2012 release directed by Mike Newell (Ironically, another Harry Potter director in Alfonso Cuaron helmed the 1998 adaptation) and to star Helena Bonham Carter, Ralph Fiennes and Jeremy Irvine as 'Pip' (The screenplay adaptation is by David Nicholl's - the writer of One Day, Starter for Ten and The Understudy). The fascination resides in the multiple themes Dicken's raises that are still relevant today - issues about class and society, the idea about your heritage and where you are from - the insight into identity and how your upbringing affects your outlook on life and how you treat others. Our lead role in Pip (John Mills) is a role whereby from the very start we see how, through no fault of his own, he is forced to commit a crime - stealing bread and food for an escaped-convict (Finlay Currie). Though this guilt is carried throughout the film, it is nevertheless an attitude which is condoned in the morals of his good friend Joe (Bernard Miles) who states that he "wouldn't let someone starve to death". This kind gesture of Pip, though criminal in its theft, is an act which contributes to the rest of his life as an unknown beneficiary funds Pip to move to London and become a 'Gentleman of Great Expectations'.

Small-Scale to Grand-Epic

David Lean is either known for the sprawling epics he created in the 50's such as Lawrence of Arabia and The Bridge on the River Kwai or the small-scale theatre-adaptations of Noel Coward including Brief Encounter and Blithe Spirit. Great Expectations is the film which shows how Lean is moving away from the small-scale drama's and towards bigger and grander stories. We have the small-scale story involving Pip and Joe or Pip and Hubert becoming close friends whilst Pip and Estella cross paths at multiple points. We also have the much more ambitious scale as we see the opening-shot of Pip running across the marshes towards his parents grave - almost hinting at the deserts of Lawrence of Arabia and potentially the single-child running across the frame akin to Empire of the Sun. The silhouettes backed onto the stunning vista's lose no sense of scale in black and white. Even the themes become much more prevalent as we see the judge sentence a group of convicts to death - the slow pan across each criminal reveals the area of society they hail from. These are the underclass and poverty-stricken people who are forced to turn to crime merely to stay alive. This theme shows a bigger story to tell - and a scale that is not small at all, but in fact a global issue regarding the divide between the upper and lower class. Even the isolated, controlling and heartless character of Mrs Havisham (Martita Hunt) is clearly representing the upper-class and their lack of love and kindness - the very idea that the upper-class are blissfully unaware of the havoc they cause to other sects of society.

It is worth noting how Joe Wright looked upon David Lean's Great Expectations as an influence for Atonement. I can see how John Mills and James McAvoy both have an air of innocence and yet a rugged working-class look that fits well in David Lean's British films. Joe Wright specifically noted how:
"There are moments like Pip running through the graveyard with the trees wiping the frame from right to left as he runs. Then Pip slams into a great trunk of a tree which turns out to be Magwich. It's another moment of genius ... There are technical lessons to be learned from Lean - but emotional ones as well".
That sequence is heightened by the great sound effects of wind and tree's bending and twisting - as if to say that at any moment something will break...

The Future Looks Bright ... 

It truly is a great film - and I think the only thing which may turn people off is the Georgian context: You either like period drama's or you don't. David Lean's use of shadow and scale is something to be marvelled at throughout the film, but it is by no means exclusively static shooting. In fact, an expressionistic sequence as Pip is ill and staggers home to bed rivals those regular New York scenes as Pip walks directly to camera as passers-by knock past him and we see light flashing as the camera takes us to his bedroom before he passes out. 

One of the closing lines are "I have come back to let in the sunlight!" and indeed, David Lean is working on a bigger canvas and larger scale - Lean is opening the windows and showing all the detail to these characters and situations. We see Jean Simmons and Alec Guinness in early roles whilst a short sequence as Pip and Wemmick (Ivor Barnard) have to nod at different points to entertain Wemmick's "Aged P" sprinkle a little humour into the mix. It was still a few years off before Lean set off for Hollywood, but clearly they knew he was coming. As the film was nominated for Best Picture, Best Director and Best Writing at the Oscars ... it was only a matter of time before he would arrive.

Tuesday, 8 February 2011

A-Z #30: Bridge on the River Kwai

You can pick up hundreds of DVD's for a round-pound each - it doesn't matter. Its never about quantity, its about quality. A-Z is my way of going through my collection, from A-Z, and justifying why I own the films... or you can tell me why I should sell 'em


#30 - Bridge on the River Kwai 

Why did I buy it?

I swear, my Dad has so much to answer for my interest in film. As much as he might despise the film-obsessive attitude I have, he has much to answer for. Akin to Ben-Hur, this 3+ hours epic film was a favourite for those Sunday afternoons. I never knew the importance of the film until many years later - David Lean directing, winning Best Picture at the Oscars for 1957, alongside winning big at the BAFTA's and the Golden Globes.
Why do I still own it?
 
Because the story is fascinating and, dare I say it, incredibly unique. Alec Guinness is captured and, as a Prisoner of War, is ordered to build a bridge and takes so much pride in the bridge that he doesn't realise that he is ultimately helping the enemy. An awesome finale - "my god - what have I done" before, Guinness falls on the lever.
But is it too big and sprawling? Maybe you don't need so much David Lean?
Remember - you can always email The Simon and Jo Film Show directly using this email: simonandjoshow@gmail.com
We are also on Twitter  and Facebook.

Large Association of Movie Blogs

Tuesday, 31 August 2010

Blithe Spirit (David Lean, 1945)

"Too much guesswork and fake mixed up with it - even when the gift is genuine - and it only very occasionally is - you can't count on it."

Introduction

As the summer holidays end - and the opportunity to watch multiple films on the same day I realise that I have managed to watch a bunch of films I had sitting on the shelf for a long time. The Shane Meadows films, some Pedro Almodovar and a few of the David Leans! I hope it continues and, with the nice quirky-ness of Blithe Spirit it puts me in a good place to continue the boxset. The film is a small scale Noel Coward play adaptation that, interestingly enough, had premiered recently on the West End shortly before David Lean and Coward worked together for the first time on In Which We Serve. As far as play adaptations go, this is one that clearly utilised the trickery-of-cinema to amp up the comedy and spooky-spirit tone of the play...

Influential Ghost's

Its a strange set-up, Mr Condomine (Rex Harrison) conducts a seance with his wife and a couple of

Wednesday, 18 August 2010

In Which We Serve (David Lean; Noel Coward, 1942)

"It is these men, in peace or war, to whom we owe so much. Above all victories, beyond all loss, in spite of changing values and a changing world they give to us, their countrymen, eternal and indominitable pride."

Introduction

I am ploughing through the David Lean collection I have mentioned many times before - this is the first collaboration between Noel Coward and David Lean - and the success, no doubt, determined the future. Based on the destroyer HMS Kelly, In Which We Serve is a British Propaganda film detailing the exploits of HMS 'Torrin' led by Captain Kinross - played with all the British-delivery-of-dialogue that could be offered by Noel Coward himself. Coward, additionally, composed the music. He was already a very strong figure in the theatre scene - having only recently released Blithe Spirit on the West End.

The Story in Reverse

Akin to many modern period films, In Which We Serve utilised the advatage of non-linear story-telling, something that would be hard to produce on stage. The beginning sets us amongst the Navy on boar5d the HMS 'Torrin' as it begins attacking another ship - the ship send bombs and torpedoes and, shortly into the the sequence, Noel Coward is ordering everyone to abandon ship. As the remaining few sailors hold onto a

Thursday, 17 September 2009

This Happy Breed (David Lean, 1944)

"I hate living here. I hate living in a house thats exactly like hundreds of other houses. I hate coming home from work on the tube. I hate washing up and helping Mum darn Dad's socks ... and what's more I know why I hate it - it's because it's all so common"

Introduction

I have had - for far too long - a David Lean boxset. A 'centenary collection' with remastered sound and restored footage. £25 from Fopp it felt like a bargain (until I saw a very similar boxset for, pretty much, £15 ... bloody Fopp). Nevertheless, I recalled a huge David Lean season at the BFI whereby I attended a discussion about Lawrence of Arabia, Bridge on the River Kwai and Passage to India. Ian Christie was on the panal alongside some guy I recognised at the time - not Nick James... was it Andrew Collins? One of those dark-haired thirty-ish, forty-ish blokes who review for Sight and Sound. It was a funny event, whereby I vividly recall some old guy complaining about the footage used when screened (before discussing each film they screened a short sequence, understandably from the DVD, and this guy when into this complete tirade about how it wasn't the original reel, etc, etc) and a woman who managed to slip into her - you couldn't really call it a question - statement that she knew Sam Spiegel ("We seem to have forgotten about Sam Spiegel a force who Lean would be nothing without ... and when I spoke to Sam..." - subtle). So I think when I got this boxset I was in this huge David Lean state-of-mind. I had seen the big Noel Coward produced-Brief Encounter (brilliant ... though I did watch it in the BFI mediatheque) and the Oscar winners Bridge on ... Kwai and Lawrence of Arabia and knew the huge influence he had on Spielberg amongst others. Either way ... it sat on my shelf a long while before I actually watched a film. First off The Passionate Friends (another time ... ) and, most recently This Happy Breed.

Knowing View

Gurinder Chadha, director of Bend it like Beckham, praised this film highly and, I have to admit, it truly is a great film. I heard that apparently half of the films made in America before 1950 have been destroyed ... so it is great that in England we look after things. This really is a great film - though it does often feel like a film for a History lesson. The blurb on the back of the DVD praises the films smooth pans a zoom in's - noting the start whereby the camera flys down from atop of London and, through three fades, zooms in through the house to focus on the door - which is promptly opened by Ethel and Frank Gibbons the parents of the family about to move in. The first thing I thought of was Citizen Kane and the famous opening in that film ... a film made three years prior. Not as groundbreaking as you might think then. The title comes from Shakespeares Richard II whereby the monologue it is used within ends with the line "This blessed plot, this earth, this realm, this England". So you are watching a very English film with a very traditional attitude - lots of tea and well-dressed middle-class folk talking about 'society'.

It traces the life of a family between WWI and WWII: The Return and seems to capture a very specific attitude in England of the time - apparently. I wasn't there, it simply seems to be the case. Frank Gibbons (Robert Newton) fought during WWI and, amongst many fantastic sequences between him and his neighbour Bob (Stanley Holloway), the two state that there won't be 'no war in our time'. Its difficult to imagine that attitude now - these two men who had fought during a World War. Who have seen the horrors and never want such a thing to happen again, having to live through the second World War two decades after. Truly a moment in history forgotten and rarely recorded. In the house are Frank and Ethel Gibbons (Celia Johnson), their three children Reggie, Queenie and Violet - Vy - and some entertaining family members in the guise of Aunt Sylvia (a brilliant sequence when 'Syl' sings a Christmas song completely out of tune provokes Frank to sneak away and have a cheeky cigar - its stranger still because I though he has this Mike-Myers quality too making it that much more cheekier) and Mrs Flint, who appears to be the Nana.

You have a great contrast between the kids, whereby Reggie is initially a man in strong support of the poor, praying that more money is given to people in poverty (this is influenced by his friend Sam, who loses his passion for his view when he marry's Vy). Queenie on the other hand hates the house and middle-class of society she lives in (see the chosen quote) - trying exceptionally hard to have a rich lifestyle. You have a short sequence set in 1928, whereby you see how free Queenie is as she dances. We also have Bob's son Billy - a Navy man - who never stops loving Queenie. Asking her to marry him many times - and being rejected - before finally winning her heart. The entire last act follows a situation whereby Queenie leaves the family home for a married man - Billy still loves her - but the shame she brings on the family forces her mother to hate her. To the point that she never wants to hear her name uttered in her house. Luckily the marriage to Billy rekindles their relationship.

Nevertheless, I am worried that the blatent influence of Welles on the opening may affect you view on this film and David Lean. There is still some flawless sequences in the film. At one point the camera seems to pan across a room and then, without an interruption, zoom out of a window and into the garden. Take Kane and add to it I guess. Another sequence, which reminds me of that sequence in Taxi Driver - when Travis is told via phone to leave Betsy alone - is also perfectly shot. Vy enters the house to inform Aunt Syl and Mrs Flint that Reggie has died in a car accident - her parents are outside and rather then show us the whole sequence, we see Vy go outside as the camera pans very, very slowly across the empty dining area. It must be a full minute before we see the parents drag themselves inside in complete shock. A speechless moment.

To conclude, the film places a firm emphasis on the family unit - and the strength of the couple Frank and Ethel themselves. Their love is what keeps the family together (well, Queenie leaves so ... maybe not always together). Interestingly, Ethel is a housewife/mother very clearly - though stern and strict - she doesn't work, and she supports Frank in every way so the establishing of the female in the house is a clear facet to the film - to the point that the freedom Queenie exercises is frowned upon by the family and, even for Queenie herself, she admits her 'wrong-doing' only to return to the family and marry the neighbour who has always been a traditionalist (even following in the military footsteps of his father). It is still a great study of this period with characters who are watchable and interesting - to the point that you feel strongly for the family when Reggie dies.

Stranger still is that one year later, Celia Johnson starred in the Noel Coward/David Lean combo of Brief Encounter - a film that explores female freedom moreso with Celia Johnson playing a character much more complex than This Happy Breed's Ethel ...