![](https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjR5sUN7Obrlccf4h8C_ZunyFMqXwaMcYsr00MaW91huIuYo_pcBGrLgjyL6s8HNV2P0lNgjeM1kOA1KRt_uOfMnnOPRpbt87wptWufZLSI6GvaL1jAhsiHpum96PfDPpZfrJUmfdY07fdK/s1600/sac4.jpg)
Introduction
Knife in the Water set
the standard for Polanski. For his directorial debut, it was nominated for
Foreign Picture at the Oscars, losing out to Fellini’s 8 ½. If you lose out to a film considered one of the greatest of
all-time, you can go home proud. Suffice to say, Polanski was sought after, eventually turning to England to create Repulsion and Cul-de-sac.
A troubled production – Donald Pleasance turned up in a Lincoln to the blustery, small village, whilst
Francoise Dorleac joined production with a small dog named Jarderane. Hardly small-scale, it remained true to Polanski's roots - claustrophobic; a small three-way cast; use of deep-focus, etc. "Cul-de-sac was decidedly a Roman Polanski film. Its obsessional tone, its fascination with the mechanics of power and humiliation" (Polanski: The Filmmaker as Voyeur by Barbara Learning) On set, Polanski became demanding and brutal – not least
because he had clearly based the film on his relationship with Basia
Kwiatkowska, which ended four years prior. Though associated with many hallmarks of his films - this film particularly had a deeply personal edge.
The Castle on a Hill
The story is set-up as two criminals are fleeing the scene
of a crime. Akin to Reservoir Dogs, we don’t see or know about the heist or robbery – but for whatever reason, they
wind up on Lindisfarne. Albie (Jack MacGowran) has been shot, and can barely
move; Richard (Lionel Stander) has been shot in his arm, so he seeks help and
finds recently-married couple George (Donald Pleasance) and Teresa (Francoise
Dorleac), who live within an old castle on the island. Teresa is unfaithful –
our first sighting of her is topless with a neighbour’s son; George is weak and
clearly cannot control his considerably younger wife – who we assume has
married him for money.
In a direct parallel with The Ghost (titled The Ghost
Writer on its US release), the family are isolated; cut off from the
outside world as the phone line is disconnected. The marshy landscape and
surrounding water combined with an upper-class elitism of the married couple,
again connect with the Pierce Brosnan/Ewan McGregor thriller.
Power Games
Unlike The Ghost,
though both films have an interest in the role of a powerful female, Cul-de-sac has a clear comedic edge –
mocking the childish weakness of Donald Pleasance against the “Lan-dan
gangster” of Lionel Stander, who carries a certain Alan-Sugar-like charm.
The sexual-politics are established early on – from the
reveal of Teresa’s infidelities through to the awkward manner that George is
introduced, standing as a child carrying a kite. In this opening sequence, we
witness the dynamic through the eyes of Richard – or ‘Dickie’ as he comes to be
known - as he checks out the building before making his intentions known;
again, Polanski places us in the place of the voyeur. But it seems ‘Dickie’ is
not seduced by Teresa either – Dickie represents the stronger, dominant male
opposed to George who, through the humiliating requests Teresa asks of him, is
reduced to a bumbling outcast. Teresa almost becomes an accomplice to Dickie as
she assists in digging the grave of Albie after he dies from his wounds – and consequently
mocks George, laughing and drinking with Dickie. Hardly an example of the supportive wife. In a similar manner to Repulsion, though a key female-role, Teresa is never supported in her frustration of George. Though we laugh at his fear, her lack of support and ridicule of him ensures that she is never seen in a positive light either.
Why, come on in!
If the tone is unclear from the outset, when a family
unexpectedly visits the castle, the humour is suddenly heightened. From the
married-man who is flirting outrageously with Teresa through to a change in
role as Dickie, to remain in the castle until his “boss” finds him, takes on
the ‘Gardener/Butler’ job to keep up appearances. Guns are fired; stained-glass
windows are broken. Though tense, we all stifle a chuckle when George fails to even hang his own picture back on the wall after a brief discussion of his artistry.
When researching Knife
in the Water, it was clear that his exploration into social-issues was a
rare theme he tackled in his debut, but I do believe that Cul-de-sac manages to touch upon some basic assumptions between the
elitist, ignorant upper-class against the rough, hyper-masculine working class.
Dickie manages to mock George tremendously to Teresa’s amusement and, only in
the final moments does George manage to re-affirm himself and protect his wife.
Of course, it’s too late then, and the guilt, shame and anger at his own
initial inaction combined with the self-destructing nature of his flawed
attempt at protection (destroying the only way of escape; giving Dickie an
opportunity to use the tommy-gun) leads to only further upset. Knife in the Water ended somewhat
ambiguously as characters continued their life with no clear change – whilst Cul-de-sac finishes as George, akin to
Gollum in The Hobbit, perches atop
of the rock, crying out about his own fate. He has lost the love he adored - not
through the actions of others – but through his own inaction.
You need only
look to the end of Chinatown to see
a striking parallel – as Nicholson looks to his love, and sadness overwhelms
him. They have lost their love – and they blame themselves. Though Nicholson's 'Gettes' is not alone, George is - and as the credits role on the top of George's misery it would be wrong to let him wallow in his own sadness. We want to comfort him a little and tell him: Forget it George,
its Lindisfarne.
Originally written for/published on Flickering Myth on 15 January 2013
Originally written for/published on Flickering Myth on 15 January 2013
No comments:
Post a Comment
Copyright 2008-2015. All posts & reviews are property of www.simoncolumb.wordpress.com/Simon Columb and should not be reproduced in whole, or in part, without express permission from the author.