I have complete intentions to be more prolific with my writing here but currently I am in a truly rubbish position as the internet has yet to be connected at home - thus I complete posts after work which is a shame. But alas, one thing I want to start doing is going through exhibitions I have visited in London. I personally see that Art is the foundations for almost everything - may it be Film, Music or Drama. It is that sense of expression which creates tha wonderful art today. I could go on with how Scorsese completed incredibly well drawn and accurate sotryboards - or discuss how James Cameron is an accomplished artist (it was his drawing of 'Rose' Jack was drawing in 'Titanic'), but whether there is evidence outside of their cinematic back-catalogue or not, the films themselves show enough to prove their artistic merit. (Nb. All the Art I mention is in the pictures displayed but, be aware that some are not next to the point they are discussed...)
The Walk Around
Having walked around the gallery it truly is impressive - a wide variety of styles and approaches to Art. Accurate observations alongside obscure, abstract sculptures. The inluence of culture of many pieces of work is inevitable - whether it be an sculptures of almost-Greek origin or an update of previous styles, inevitably, everyone will find something interesting about this exhibition.
Lowlights
I followed The Saatchi School - a reality TV programme that followed a group of artists leading to one being chosen to appear in this exhibition and the tour it is a part of - which begun in St Petersburg. The Winner was Eugenie Scrase with her piece 'Trunkated Trunk'. I remember watching the show and, though not a big fan of the Duchamp object-is-art approach, I could appreciate the unique entity of the hevy weight of a log and what appears to be careful balance on a fence. More impressive was the gate holding, virtually, the entire tree before it was trunkated - but alas, it is what it is and, upon viewing it, it truly isn't as inspiring as I believed it could have been. I think, by seeing the 'trunk' in comparison to the range of other artists part of the exhibition showed how, in comparison it was not really that impressive. Make of it what you will.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/00abb/00abb84b791479a9a8e85d060662dfe7c0b26c81" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d27ed/d27edb3397b2d5dc99b55efeb08cb7d03d721276" alt=""
Highlights
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/2ff2d/2ff2da62d95f919537b5358d621758c858933df9" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1bf5a/1bf5a9549b22b6c201ec0226866a96bba26ff357" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/57c0a/57c0a96b9e2e00636972c406cae214b2b28765d7" alt=""
Finally, the link to the actual website to explore more - and their truly is alot to explore.
All the speakers are working in John Wynne's piece. The sound moves in subtle trajectories through 32 channels of sound (think of stereo and multiply by 16) distributed across the 300 speakers. It's difficult to pinpoint an individual speaker and hear a sound from it because the sound will only come from any single speaker for a short period of time before moving to another speaker. Amongst other things, the piece plays with people's expectations - the sound seems to come from everywhere and nowhere. And people also expect 300 speakers to be loud. But obviously some people are sensitive to the subtleties of sound and some aren't. One needs to spend some time in the space in order to become aware of the gentle diffusion of the sounds. The piece is also deliberately left untitled so that people bring their own interpretations and metaphorical meanings to it rather than saying, Tower of Babel, right, I get it. Sorry you didn't like it, but most of the press seems to disagree...
ReplyDeleteAdrian Searle: ian.co.uk/artanddesign/2010/jun/06/newspeak-british-art-now-saatchi-gallery
Brian Sewell: http://www.thisislondon.co.uk/arts/review-23840864-is-it-me-or-is-this-good.do
Charles Darwent: http://www.independent.co.uk/arts-entertainment/art/reviews/newspeak-british-art-now-the-saatchi-gallery-london-1992313.html
Jackie Wullschlager: http://knowingviews.blogspot.com/2010/06/newspeak-british-art-now-part-1-saatchi.html
The full link for the Guardian article:
ReplyDeletehttp://www.guardian.co.uk/artanddesign/2010/jun/06/newspeak-british-art-now-saatchi-gallery
Thanks John for commenting first-off! This was my first attempt at 'reviewing' an art exhibition - I thought the connections between cinema and art should be more clearly depicted.
ReplyDeleteI did spend a while in the space - and maybe as I was so attracted to Meireles work, I simply couldn't get it out of my head, thus affecting my judgement. I like the play on expectations, I personally just didn't 'feel' all the sound (I guess I am not "sensitive to the subtleties of sound"), but I think that, as so many other people were so positive about it, I must be in a minority.
Well done though on being a part of such a successful exhibition!